| Home | ||
| About NCCTG | ||
| About Clinical Trials | ||
| NCCTG Trial Listings | ||
| Treating Locations | ||
NCCTG News
| ||
| Patient Advocacy | ||
| Biospecimen Access | ||
| Links | ||
| System | ||
| Institutional Members Only |
Patients were randomly selected to receive either 75 mg of venlafaxine orally every day or one 400 mg intramuscular shot of MPA , and then report on hot flashes, potential side effects and quality of life issues over a six-week period. Significantly more reductions in hot flashes were observed in the MPA arm when compared to venlafaxine (79 percent versus 55 percent reduction). The effectiveness of the single dose of MPA was similar for cancer patients with or without concomitant tamoxifen therapy, and treatment effectiveness also appeared to be the same for women with a history of breast cancer versus not.
Although follow-up information is not available for all the patients after six weeks, the data that were collected indicate that the improved hot flash benefit appeared to last for at least six months in some women following the single MPA dose. Almost three times as many MPA patients still reported a 90 percent reduction in hot flashes after 6 months, compared to those receiving venlafaxine.
While both venlafaxine and MPA appear to be well-tolerated, MPA shows a distinct advantage in the early part of treatment, with the patients receiving venlafaxine reporting more nausea, appetite loss, dizziness, constipation, mouth dryness and sleepiness. One shot of MPA also costs 3-4 times less than does a three-month supply of venlafaxine. The obvious benefits do need to be weighed against the uncertainty that exists with regard to MPA safety, in terms of risk for breast cancer, says Dr. Loprinzi. “While there are some data to suggest that MPA might slightly increase breast cancer risk, other data suggest that it, when not given in combination with estrogen, might decrease risk. All said, MPA does provide a treatment option that is reasonable for women to consider.”
Other Mayo Clinic researchers involved with this study include: Debra Barton, Ph.D. and Jeff Sloan, Ph.D. Additional NCCTG investigators include: Ralph Levitt, M.D., Meritcare Hospital Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP), Fargo, N.D.; Shaker Dakhil, M.D., Wichita CCOP, Wichita, Kan.; Daniel Nikcevich, M.D., Duluth CCOP, Duluth, Minn.; James Bearden III, M.D., Upstate Carolina CCOP, Spartanburg, S.C.; James Mailliard, M.D., Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium, Omaha, Neb.; Loren Tschetter, M.D., Sioux Community Cancer Consortium, Sioux Falls, S.D.; Tom Fitch, M.D., Scottsdale CCOP, Scottsdale, Ariz.; and John Kugler, M.D., Illinois Oncology Research Association CCOP, Peoria, Ill.
NCCTG is a national clinical research group sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, comprised of a network of more than 1,000 community-based cancer treatment clinics in the United States, Canada and Mexico that work with Mayo Clinic to conduct clinical studies for advancing cancer treatment.
For more information on cancer research at Mayo Clinic, visit http://cancercenter.mayo.edu. For more information about NCCTG, visit http://ncctg.
© Copyright 2008, NCCTG